For Barristers

Get an evidence-linked clinical chronology and issue map before deeper legal analysis.

MedCase analyses the records against clinical protocols and surfaces severity-scored, evidence-linked findings so you can move straight to the legal questions in conference, advice, and pleading.

View sample output Schedule a Demo

Workflow fit

Where it fits across your instruction.

At conference

Walk into conference with an evidence-linked issue map, not a stack of records to navigate live. Severity-scored findings prioritise the issues worth discussing.

At advice stage

Structured findings with direct quotes, protocol references, and page citations give you a verifiable starting point for advice on breach and causation themes.

At pleading stage

A clear issue map with citations back to the record supports tighter pleadings and more focused expert instructions.

Sample finding

Every finding is grounded.

Severity score, direct evidence quote, protocol reference, page citation. Designed to be verifiable line by line.

View full sample output
Finding #3: Delayed Specialist Referral 8/10

“[PATIENT] presented with persistent chest pain on three consecutive visits...”

NICE CG95 Section 3.1 Page 47, Para 3

AI limitations & human review

MedCase uses AI to assist in the review of medical records against established clinical standards. The output is an analytical aid for qualified legal and medical professionals. It does not constitute medical advice, a diagnosis, a legal opinion, or a determination of negligence. All outputs should be reviewed and verified by a qualified solicitor and/or medical professional before use in any legal matter.

More on security and AI limitations in the Trust Centre.

FAQ

FAQs for counsel

Who typically instructs MedCase?
In most cases, instructing solicitors run MedCase on the medical record set and share the findings report with counsel ahead of conference, advice, or pleading. Chambers can also subscribe directly where appropriate.
What does the output look like in practice?
A severity-scored findings report with direct evidence quotes, protocol references (NICE, Royal College, local trust pathways), and page citations. AI case chat is available to interrogate the record with grounded, source-cited answers.
Can findings be exported for use in pleadings or expert instructions?
Findings are presented in a structured format that can be copied or summarised into pleadings, advice, or expert instructions. Each finding cites the underlying record page, so verification remains easy.
Is the output appropriate to put in front of a medical expert?
Yes, as a structured pre-read. Findings are an analytical aid for qualified professional review, not an expert opinion. The medical expert remains responsible for the clinical view and any reliance on findings is for the expert to verify against the record.
How does MedCase handle privilege and confidentiality?
Records are encrypted at rest, hosted in Europe, and accessed through organisation-scoped accounts with audit logging. PII is sanitised before any AI processing, and customer records are not used to train AI models. Full detail is in the Trust Centre and DPA.
Does the output amount to automated decision-making about claimants?
No. MedCase outputs are decision-support for qualified legal and medical professionals. They do not make solely automated legal or similarly significant decisions about claimants within the meaning of UK GDPR Article 22.

Ready to Transform Your Case Preparation?

Analyse medical records against clinical protocols in minutes and surface evidence-linked findings for qualified review.

View sample output Schedule a Demo